Focus

Microservices and Self-Contained Systems

Articles, talks, trainings and more about Microservices and Self-Contained Systems.

From microservices to SCS: making the right architecture decision

Microservices are an architectural style that splits an application into many small services, each owning a single business capability and its own data. Services deploy independently and stay loosely coupled, so teams can ship on their own schedule. The trade-off is everything that comes with a distributed system: calls across the network, data consistency, observability, and the operational load of running many moving parts.

Whether microservices are the right call comes down to context: how cleanly your domains and teams split apart, how much operational overhead you can take on, and whether a modular monolith or Self-contained Systems would serve you better. These are the architecture decisions we help teams work through, starting from your domains rather than a template.

Our Services

We advise honestly, think innovatively and love to build. The result: successful software solutions, infrastructures and business models.

Primers

Case Studies

Case Study

Creating a “Best in Industry” E-Commerce Platform with Self-Contained Systems

Case Study

SACAC optimizes the quotation process with a customized software solution

Frequently Asked Questions

Do you have questions about Architecture Strategy? Here you will find answers to questions we are frequently asked.

What does architecture strategy mean, and when do I need it?

Architecture strategy means aligning technical decisions with your business objectives: cloud providers and platforms, dependencies, team structures, delivery capability – and the question of what to build yourself versus what to buy. The need typically arises with growth and scaling, when time-to-market is no longer acceptable, or when costs and effort need to be reduced.

How does architecture strategy help improve time-to-market?

When delivering new requirements takes too long, the cause often lies in systems and teams that are too tightly coupled, blocking one another. We help define meaningful boundaries – between domains, services, and teams. Using methods such as domain-driven design and Team Topologies, we create divisions that are grounded in business logic and enable independent working.

How does INNOQ support cloud and platform strategies?

AWS, Azure, or a European alternative? How much vendor dependency can you afford? We help you ask the right questions and develop platform strategies that strike the right balance between agility, control, and cost-effectiveness.

What does digital sovereignty have to do with software architecture?

Digital sovereignty is not just about choosing a cloud provider – it’s determined by the architecture of your software. Where do dependencies on frameworks, supply chains, or interfaces arise? Which of those are deliberate, and which have grown historically? We evaluate your systems and help you actively manage dependencies and risks.

When does custom development make sense, and when is off-the-shelf software sufficient (make or buy)?

Off-the-shelf software is essential – it lets you focus resources on the areas where real differentiation happens. Using methods such as Wardley Mapping, we make visible where custom development creates competitive advantage and where standard solutions are the better choice.

Does INNOQ advise independently of vendors?

Yes. We advise without a hidden agenda – no commissions, no exclusive partnerships influencing our recommendations. Whether cloud providers, frameworks, or tools: we evaluate neutrally and select from the entire market what is optimal for your situation.