What If BPMN Were a Modeling Language?

May 4, 2007

Bruce Silver:

Lacking support for fundamental concepts like human tasks and subprocesses, BPEL has become a favorite whipping boy of BPM vendors and consultants.  But for all its faults, BPEL enjoys something that BPMN advocates can only dream about: an XML storage and interchange format that makes sense.  It’s often said that BPEL is an XML language not a graphical notation, but the reality is that graphical BPEL design tools all use more or less the same notation, based on a simple mapping to native BPEL language constructs: Receive, Reply, Invoke, etc.  BPMN has a standard notation, but still lacks a standard storage and interchange format consistent with the fundamental goals of BPMN itself.

About

This page contains a single entry from Stefan Tilkov's Random Stuff posted on May 4, 2007 10:32 PM. The previous post in this blog was IBM vs UDDI War Heats Up. The next post in this blog is The Challenges of Latency. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Comments